Sounds like the bio tabs are ph-balanced on their own, so i woudln't fiddle with it unless you find a reason to do so. If bio tabs are ph-buffered and balanced, i wouldn't worry about RO. RO is more susceptible to ph-drift, simply due to the lack of solutes, which is also a good thing in other respects. If you see it wildly swinging around, then i'd consider using tap water - see if that fixes the problem.
You can measure runoff, but it's never precisely representative of what's resulting around the roots. So, this can be good info / good practice, but only after you form a baseline (famiiar) with what is normal when the plant is growing well and healthy (over a long period of time, and not a snapshot). Then you can discern when the readings from a flawed measurement process is worth reacting to.
You can do a soil slurry - again, needs familiarity to be more useful information.
how you measure will impact what you see... be consistent when you measure runoff (early runoff will measure differently than later runoff) or how much you use in a slurry and the ph of water added to start etc... Yes, 6.2 is a good goal, but the reading of runoff is not what exists around the roots more times than not. hell.. if your tray is dirty with dried up nutes it'll potentially fuck up the reading too.
i know someone using biotabs and seems to be a complete diet on its own. Shouldn't need to do anything else. Seen others with different results, but that was probably user-error. Keep it simple. don't try to do too much. Get things running smoothly, then add more "sophisticated" wrinkles if you want.